ArticleSTAR protocols2022
Speech-to-Speech Synchronization protocol to classify human participants as high or low auditory-motor synchronizers.
Article in STAR protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Linking spontaneous speech synchronization and cognitive abilities: evidence from a syllable-timed language.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Rhythmic skills mediate the link between music training and cognition via attention and phonological processing.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Reply to: The timing of speech-to-speech synchronization is governed by the P-center.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The timing of speech-to-speech synchronization is governed by the P-center.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Refined analysis of the Speech-to-Speech Synchronization task reveals subharmonic synchronization.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Not primed to agree? Short or no effect of rhythmic priming on typical adults processing number agreement.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Concurrent processing of the prosodic hierarchy is supported by cortical entrainment and phase-amplitude coupling.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Rats synchronize predictively to metronomes.iScience · 2024Article
- Auditory-motor synchronization and perception suggest partially distinct time scales in speech and music.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Building national patient registries in Mexico: insights from the MexOMICS Consortium.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Replication of population-level differences in auditory-motor synchronization ability in a Norwegian-speaking population.Communications psychology · 2023Article
- Auditory-motor synchronization varies among individuals and is critically shaped by acoustic features.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Explaining flexible continuous speech comprehension from individual motor rhythms.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Studying rhythm processing in speech through the lens of auditory-motor synchronization.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Differential activation of a frontoparietal network explains population-level differences in statistical learning from speech.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- On the Role of Neural Oscillations Across Timescales in Speech and Music Processing.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to synchronize a motor action to a rhythmic auditory stimulus is often considered an innate human skill. However, some individuals lack the ability to synchronize speech to a perceived syllabic rate. Here, we describe a simple and fast protocol to classify a single native English speaker as being or not being a speech synchronizer. This protocol consists of four parts: the pretest instructions and volume adjustment, the training procedure, the execution of the main task, and data analysis. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Assaneo et al. (2019a).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.