Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35310002›Full record

ArticleNordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT2021

User involvement in interprofessional team meetings within services for substance use disorders.

Merethe Wenaas, Helle Wessel Andersson, Riina Kiik, Anne Juberg

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Challenges in using patient involvement principles in substance use treatment.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Dealing with qualitative work.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merethe WenaasMøre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Alesund, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-0582
Helle Wessel AnderssonSt. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2153-6088
Riina KiikNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Anne JubergNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOÅlesund Hospital · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with substance use disorders (SUD) and concurrent mental health disorders often need prolonged, coordinated health and welfare services. Interprofessional team meetings are designed to tailor services to users' needs and should be based on interprofessional collaboration involving the user. Aims: To investigate service users' experiences with interprofessional team meetings and to identify potential barriers to successful user involvement. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with five male service users aged 27-36 years with concurrent substance use and psychiatric disorders, and observations of team meetings involving both users and relevant professionals. Users were interviewed shortly after commencing treatment and after the team meeting. A phenomenographical approach framed the data analysis. Results: Users described the interprofessional team meetings as less than useful, and perceived that lack of a targeted process and of information hindered their collaboration with professionals. Observations revealed that users were given a subordinate role in the meetings, which largely undermined their involvement. Three categories reflecting lack of information as a core obstacle to user involvement emerged from the data material: (i) unclear role responsibilities and unclear professional role functions, (ii) unclear practices regarding rules and routines, and (iii) absence of user knowledge. Conclusions: User involvement in team meetings may be improved by facilitating adequate information, clarifying role expectations, emphasising user knowledge, increasing professionals' awareness of the importance of collaboration, and by teaching skills that enhance user involvement.

Indexed as

collaborationinterprofessional team meetingsphenomenographical approachsubstance use disorderuser involvement

Identifiers

PMID35310002
PMCPMC8899073
OpenAlexW3120596756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.