Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35309882›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2022

Skin Changes and Safety Profile of Topical Products During Pregnancy.

Imam Budi Putra, Nelva Karmila Jusuf, Nani Kumala Dewi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phenolic Compounds fromAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Update on specific dermatoses of pregnancy.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  11. Update to acne vulgaris treatment for Canadian practice.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imam Budi PutraAll authors are with the Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sumatera Utara in Medan, Indonesia.
Nelva Karmila JusufAll authors are with the Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sumatera Utara in Medan, Indonesia.
Nani Kumala DewiAll authors are with the Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sumatera Utara in Medan, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We sought to know the efficacy and safety profile of topical products for use during pregnancy. Methods: We used PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to review literature on topical products and pregnancy. Results: A majority of pregnant women develop skin changes, including physiological or hormonal changes, worsening of preexisting skin conditions, or the appearance of new dermatoses during pregnancy. Most pregnant women are concerned about the availability of treatments options with good safety profiles, especially for skin and hair treatments, to maintain their appearance and health. Although most of the treatments are recommended to be used after delivery, there are some alternatives to prevent and treat skin lesions during pregnancy. Conclusion: The most current and comprehensive information about the efficacy and safety profile of topical products in pregnancy are necessary.

Indexed as

cosmeticspregnancysafetySkin care

Identifiers

PMID35309882
PMCPMC8884185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.