Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35309720›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2022

Science and practice of imaging physics through 50 years of SPIE Medical Imaging conferences.

Adam Wang, Ian Cunningham, Mats Danielsson, Rebecca Fahrig, Thomas Flohr, Christoph Hoeschen, Frederic Noo, John M Sabol, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen, Anders Tingberg and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Development and Characterization of Microparticles withAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Adam WangStanford University, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States.
Ian CunninghamWestern University, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mats DanielssonKTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Physics, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-9791
Rebecca FahrigSiemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
Thomas FlohrSiemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
Christoph HoeschenOtto-von-Guericke University, Institute of Medical Engineering, Magdeburg, Germany.
Frederic NooUniversity of Utah, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
John M SabolKonica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Wayne, New Jersey, United States.
Jeffrey H SiewerdsenJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-1317
Anders TingbergLund University, Skåne University Hospital, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3078-0725
John YorkstonCarestream Health, Rochester, New York, United States.
Wei ZhaoStony Brook University, Department of Radiology, Stony Brook, New York, United States.
Ehsan SameiDuke University, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-3309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

computed tomographyflat-panel detectorfluoroscopyimage qualityimage reconstructionmammographymedical imagingmedical physicsradiographytomosynthesisx-ray

Identifiers

PMID35309720
PMCPMC8926876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.