ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2022
Teacher-student interaction in a special school for students with developmental disabilities in Chinese context.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Mathematics Learning for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in China: A Qualitative Study of Instructional Support.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper analyzes interactions between teachers and students with developmental disabilities in a special education school in China, which is still the main educational placement for the disabled in China. Video observation data collected from six students in second grade and one teacher, were coded by an improved Flanders Interaction Analysis System (iFIAS). Results indicate that the teacher played the dominant role in the class while her/his instruction was student-oriented, several evidence-based strategies were used to motivate students' engagement, including questioning, timely feedback, reinforcement, game teaching, students' self-determination. Few peer interactions happened due to homogeneous grouping. Besides, the frequency of interaction patterns between teachers and students with developmental disabilities (DD) of different learning ability was similar while the interaction patterns were different. There were more non-academic interactions between the teacher and students with most serious disabilities in the class than others, while there existed more cognitive extension-partial and full interactions between teachers and students with least serious disabilities in the class than others. The results shed light on how teachers interact with students who have DD, and how interactions can be differentially delivered to students with DD of various learning abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.