ArticleBiology of sport2022
Physiological responses after two different CrossFit workouts.
Article in Biology of sport, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Solving the High-Intensity Multimodal Training Prescription Puzzle: A Systematic Mapping Review.Sports medicine - open · 2024Pooled it
- Physiological effects of regular CrossFitFrontiers in physiology · 2023Pooled it
- Dark Chocolate Mitigates Premenstrual Performance Impairments and Muscle Soreness in Female CrossFitNutrients · 2025Trial
- Time-Course of Recovery Following a Strength-Power Emphasized CrossfitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychobehavioral profiles, competitive progression, and nutritional characteristics in CrossFit® athletes across a national competitive season.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Block periodization vs. traditional periodization in high-intensity functional training: a randomized crossover study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Metabolic and perceived effort responses following acute multi-ingredient pre-workout supplementation prior to high-intensity functional training workouts.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Nutrition in CrossFit® - scientific evidence and practical perspectives: a systematic scoping review.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025Article
- Comparison of physiological and psychobiological acute responses between high intensity functional training and high intensity continuous training.Sports medicine and health science · 2025Article
- Acute physiological responses and performance determinants in HyroxFrontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Sex-related differences in the acute physiological response to a high-intensity CrossFit® workout.Current research in physiology · 2025Article
- The Effects of CrossFitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Assessment of Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Contributions in an Extreme Intensity CrossFitSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Functional assessment of respiratory muscles and lung capacity of CrossFit athletes.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Article
- Physiological Responses at 15 Minutes of Recovery after a Session of Functional Fitness Training in Well-Trained Athletes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Quantifying CrossFitFrontiers in sports and active living · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the physiological response to CrossFit "workouts of the day" (WODs) based on two different structures of training session: 1) the "as many repetitions as possible" (AMRAP) "Cindy" and 2) the "round for time" (RFT) "Open 18.4" session. CrossFit athletes (11 men and 12 women) were divided into two groups: 1) one performing the WOD "Cindy" (GC) and 2) one performing the WOD "Open 18.4" (GO). Before, immediately after and 30 min after WODs, blood lactate (LAC), heart rate (HR) and systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were measured. A two-way ANOVA indicated differences in physiological responses between GC and GO. Both WODs increased HR to similar levels. Only GO significantly increased SBP immediately after exercise compared to the rest period (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.