Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35309516›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

UPMaBoSS: A Novel Framework for Dynamic Cell Population Modeling.

Gautier Stoll, Aurélien Naldi, Vincent Noël, Eric Viara, Emmanuel Barillot, Guido Kroemer, Denis Thieffry, Laurence Calzone

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Gautier StollEquipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
Aurélien NaldiInstitut de Biologie de L'ENS (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.
Vincent NoëlInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Eric ViaraSysra, Yerres, France.
Emmanuel BarillotInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Guido KroemerEquipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
Denis ThieffryInstitut de Biologie de L'ENS (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.
Laurence CalzoneInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers · FRÉcole Normale Supérieure - PSL · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure · FRParisTech · FRUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical modeling aims at understanding the effects of biological perturbations, suggesting ways to intervene and to reestablish proper cell functioning in diseases such as cancer or in autoimmune disorders. This is a difficult task for obvious reasons: the level of details needed to describe the intra-cellular processes involved, the numerous interactions between cells and cell types, and the complex dynamical properties of such populations where cells die, divide and interact constantly, to cite a few. Another important difficulty comes from the spatial distribution of these cells, their diffusion and motility. All of these aspects cannot be easily resolved in a unique mathematical model or with a unique formalism. To cope with some of these issues, we introduce here a novel framework, UPMaBoSS (for Update Population MaBoSS), dedicated to modeling dynamic populations of interacting cells. We rely on the preexisting tool MaBoSS, which enables probabilistic simulations of cellular networks. A novel software layer is added to account for cell interactions and population dynamics, but without considering the spatial dimension. This modeling approach can be seen as an intermediate step towards more complex spatial descriptions. We illustrate our methodology by means of a case study dealing with TNF-induced cell death. Interestingly, the simulation of cell population dynamics with UPMaBoSS reveals a mechanism of resistance triggered by TNF treatment. Relatively easy to encode, UPMaBoSS simulations require only moderate computational power and execution time. To ease the reproduction of simulations, we provide several Jupyter notebooks that can be accessed within the CoLoMoTo Docker image, which contains all software and models used for this study.

Indexed as

cell interactionsheterogeneous cell populationlogical modelpathway modelingstochastic simulation

Identifiers

PMID35309516
PMCPMC8924294
OpenAlexW4220898999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.