ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Which Contributes to Clinical Performance: Academic Output or Person-Environment Fit?
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of AI-driven simulation integrated with virtual case-based training on diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning homogenization among junior ophthalmologists: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Influence of Multiple Factors on Musicology Doctoral Students' Academic Performance: An Empirical Study Based in China.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Measuring and improving performance of clinicians: an application of patient-based records.BMC health services research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The measures put in place by health authorities to ensure the professionalism of doctors are important. Hospitals in China have included academic outputs in the promotion criteria to incentive medical clinicians to engage in scientific research so that to improve job performance (JP). However, such practice disproportionally focuses on academic outputs but ignores the force of needs fulfilled brought by intrinsic incentive. This study aims to discuss the realistic problem regarding the promotion mechanism and the potential drivers to clinical JP. Methods: This study was based on multi-source data collection on clinical performance from electric medical record (EMR), person-environment (P-E) fit from the survey, and academic output from personnel files of ward clinicians ( Results: Clinicians who were promoted were more productive in producing academic outputs than those who were not ( Conclusion: This study shows that P-E fit plays a more important role in facilitating clinical performance than academic performance and highlights the importance of intrinsic motivation of clinicians in achieving clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.