Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35309184›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Providers' Shift to Telerehabilitation at the U.S. Veterans Health Administration During COVID-19: Practical Applications.

Consuelo M Kreider, Jennifer Hale-Gallardo, John C Kramer, Sharon Mburu, Mackenzi R Slamka, Kimberly E Findley, Keith J Myers, Sergio Romero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Importance of Telerehabilitation and Future Directions for the Field.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025
    Article
  6. Utilization and Cost of Veterans Health Administration Referrals to Community Care-Based Physical Therapy.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Consuelo M KreiderDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Jennifer Hale-GallardoVeterans Rural Health Resource Center-Salt Lake City (VRHRC-SLC), Office of Rural Health, Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
John C KramerDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Sharon MburuDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Mackenzi R SlamkaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Kimberly E FindleyDepartment of Veterans Affairs, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Research Service, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Keith J MyersVeterans Rural Health Resource Center-Gainesville (VRHRC-GNV), Office of Rural Health, Veterans Health Administration, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Sergio RomeroVeterans Rural Health Resource Center-Gainesville (VRHRC-GNV), Office of Rural Health, Veterans Health Administration, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telerehabilitation provides Veteran patients with necessary rehabilitation treatment. It enhances care continuity and reduces travel time for Veterans who face long distances to receive care at a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical facility. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a sudden shift to telehealth-including telerehabilitation, where a paucity of data-driven guidelines exist that are specific to the practicalities entailed in telerehabilitation implementation. This paper explicates gains in practical knowledge for implementing telerehabilitation that were accelerated during the rapid shift of VHA healthcare from out-patient rehabilitation services to telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Group and individual interviews with 12 VHA rehabilitation providers were conducted to examine, in-depth, the providers' implementation of telerehabilitation. Thematic analysis yielded nine themes: (i) Willingness to Give Telerehabilitation a Chance: A Key Ingredient; (ii) Creativity and Adaptability: Critical Attributes for Telerehabilitation Providers; (iii) Adapting Assessments; (iv) Adapting Interventions; (v) Role and Workflow Adaptations; (vi) Appraising for Self the Feasibility of the Telerehabilitation Modality; (vii) Availability of Informal, In-Person Support Improves Feasibility of Telerehabilitation; (viii) Shifts in the Expectations by the Patients and by the Provider; and (ix) Benefit and Anticipated Future of Telerehabilitation. This paper contributes an in-depth understanding of clinical reasoning considerations, supportive strategies, and practical approaches for engaging Veterans in telerehabilitation.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineTelerehabilitationHumansPandemicsVeterans Healthaccess to healthcarehealth care deliveryhealth care providersqualitative evaluationtelemedicineVeterans

Identifiers

PMID35309184
PMCPMC8931404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.