Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35309178›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

Targeting COPD with PLGA-Based Nanoparticles: Current Status and Prospects.

Juhi Saxena, Monish Bisen, Aditya Misra, Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Sanket Kaushik, Arif Jamal Siddiqui, Neetu Mishra, Abhijeet Singh, Anupam Jyoti

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Nanoparticles to target asthma.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Aerosol pulmonary immune engineering.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Juhi SaxenaDepartment of Biotechnology, University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab 140413, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7555-4292
Monish BisenFaculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, Solan, Himachal Pradesh 173229, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-5265
Aditya MisraFaculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, Solan, Himachal Pradesh 173229, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1475-4148
Vijay Kumar SrivastavaAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Amity Education Valley, Kant Kalwar, NH-11C, Jaipur-Delhi Highway, Jaipur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-9391
Sanket KaushikAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Amity Education Valley, Kant Kalwar, NH-11C, Jaipur-Delhi Highway, Jaipur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0386-881X
Arif Jamal SiddiquiDepartment of Biology, College of Science, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, P.O. Box 2440, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6236-0920
Neetu MishraSymbiosis School of Biological Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra 412115, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0526-2056
Abhijeet SinghDepartment of Biosciences, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan 303007, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-6080
Anupam JyotiDepartment of Biotechnology, University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab 140413, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-7466
Chandigarh University · INShoolini University · INManipal University JaipurSymbiosis International University · INUniversity of Ha'il · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is pulmonary emphysema characterized by blockage in the airflow resulting in the long-term breathing problem, hence a major cause of mortality worldwide. Excessive generation of free radicals and the development of chronic inflammation are the major two episodes underlying the pathogenesis of COPD. Currently used drugs targeting these episodes including anti-inflammatory, antioxidants, and corticosteroids are unsafe, require high doses, and pose serious side effects. Nanomaterial-conjugated drugs have shown promising therapeutic potential against different respiratory diseases as they are required in small quantities which lower overall treatment costs and can be effectively targeted to diseased tissue microenvironment hence having minimal side effects. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) are safe as their breakdown products are easily metabolized in the body. Drugs loaded on the PLGA NPs have been shown to be promising agents as anticancer, antimicrobial, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory. Surface modification of PLGA NPs can further improve their mechanical properties, drug loading potential, and pharmacological activities. In the present review, we have presented a brief insight into the pathophysiological mechanism underlying COPD and highlighted the role, potential, and current status of PLGA NPs loaded with drugs in the therapy of COPD.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAntioxidantsDrug CarriersGlycolsHumansLactic AcidPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerAntioxidantsDrug CarriersGlycolsLactic AcidPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer

Identifiers

PMID35309178
PMCPMC8933108
OpenAlexW4220683062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.