ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022
Comparative Genomics of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) of Felids.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal detection and genetic characterization of feline coronavirus in a captive cheetah population.The Journal of general virology · 2026Article
- Unraveling genome- and immunome-wide genetic diversity in modern and historical Jaguars.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Analyzing the impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on the incidence of prostate cancer and the advantage of T cell therapy in patients after kidney transplantation based on the United Network for Organ Sharing database.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Genetic and Epigenetic Aspects of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Modern View on the Problem.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- De novo genome assembly depicts the immune genomic characteristics of cattle.Nature communications · 2023Article
- MHC architecture in amphibians - ancestral reconstruction, gene rearrangements and duplication patterns.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Comparative genomics of the Leukocyte Receptor Complex in carnivores.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review summarizes the current knowledge on the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) of the family Felidae. This family comprises an important domestic species, the cat, as well as a variety of free-living felids, including several endangered species. As such, the Felidae have the potential to be an informative model for studying different aspects of the biological functions of MHC genes, such as their role in disease mechanisms and adaptation to different environments, as well as the importance of genetic diversity for conservation issues in free-ranging or captive populations. Despite this potential, the current knowledge on the MHC in the family as a whole is fragmentary and based mostly on studies of the domestic cat and selected species of big cats. The overall structure of the domestic cat MHC is similar to other mammalian MHCs following the general scheme "centromere-MHC class I-MHC class III-MHC class II" with some differences in the gene contents. An unambiguously defined orthologue of the non-classical class I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.