ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2022
Gastric Cancer Screening Methods: A Comparative Study of the Chinese New Gastric Cancer Screening Score and Kyoto Classification of Gastritis.
Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Divergent roles of endoscopic Kyoto classification and serological Li's scoring in immediate and long-term gastric cancer risk stratification: a 4-year longitudinal study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Recent advancement in endoscopic diagnosis for risk stratification of gastric cancer.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Gastric cancer in children infected withWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of interaction between an artificial intelligence endoscopic support system and endoscopists on diagnosis of gastric neoplastic lesions.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Application of Machine Learning in the Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer Using the Kyoto Classification Score and Clinical Features Collected from Medical Consultations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of developing gastric cancer based on a questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Gastric cancer incidence based on endoscopic Kyoto classification of gastritis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Kyoto classification of gastritis: Advances and future perspectives in endoscopic diagnosis of gastritis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- A Novel Plasma-Based Methylation Panel for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Early Detection.Cancers · 2022Article
- Application of a novel scoring system for gastric cancer opportunistic screening in hospital visits.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the Chinese new gastric cancer screening score (i.e., Li's score) and Kyoto Classification of Gastritis for screening gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 702 patients were scored using the two scoring methods. Gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer (including early gastric cancer) were compared between the two scoring methods. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity of the two scoring methods were evaluated. Results: Both of the two scoring methods found that gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer (including early gastric cancer) were all significantly higher in the medium-risk and high-risk group patients than those in the low-risk group patients. According to the Kyoto Classification of Gastritis, patients in the high-risk group had more gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer than those in the medium-risk group patients. Gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer in the low-risk and medium-risk group patients evaluated by the Li score were all significantly higher than those in patients with corresponding risk level evaluated by Kyoto Classification of Gastritis, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of the Li score was 0.702, and the sensitivity and specificity were 57.6% and 85.3%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of the Kyoto Classification of Gastritis was 0.826, and the sensitivity and specificity were 75.4% and 83.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Both Li's score and Kyoto Classification of Gastritis showed good screening value for gastric cancer, but Kyoto Classification of Gastritis was more sensitive than the Li score.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.