Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35309016›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science. Nano2022

Determination of metallic nanoparticles in biological samples by single particle ICP-MS: a systematic review from sample collection to analysis.

Adam Laycock, Nathaniel J Clark, Robert Clough, Rachel Smith, Richard D Handy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science. Nano, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam LaycockCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Harwell Campus Didcot OX11 0RQ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-5149
Nathaniel J ClarkSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth Drake Circus Plymouth PL4 8AA UK r.handy@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-503X
Robert CloughAnalytical Research Facility, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth Plymouth PL4 8AA UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-6671
Rachel SmithCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Harwell Campus Didcot OX11 0RQ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9784-3586
Richard D HandySchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth Drake Circus Plymouth PL4 8AA UK r.handy@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4458-1279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic review of the use of single particle ICP-MS to analyse engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) in biological samples (plants, animals, body fluids) has highlighted that efforts have focused on a select few types of ENMs (

Identifiers

PMID35309016
PMCPMC8852815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.