ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2021
Predicting Motor Responsiveness to Deep Brain Stimulation with Machine Learning.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Models for Motor Outcomes From Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Computational Insights Into Smart Bioelectronics in Digital Health Care (2020-2024): Topic Modeling Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Review
- The Application of Machine Learning to Predict Clinical Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is a complex movement disorder intervention that requires highly invasive brain surgery. Clinicians struggle to predict how patients will respond to this treatment. To address this problem, we are working toward developing a clinical tool to help neurologists predict deep brain stimulation response. We analyzed a cohort of 105 Parkinson's patients who underwent deep brain stimulation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. We developed binary and multicategory models for predicting likelihood of motor symptom reduction after undergoing deep brain stimulation. We compared the performances of our best models to predictions made by neurologist experts in movement disorders. The strongest binary classification model achieved a 10-fold cross validation AUC of 0.90, outperforming the best neurologist predictions (0.56). These results are promising for future clinical applications, though more work is necessary to validate these findings in a larger cohort and taking into consideration broader quality of life outcome measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35308984PMC8861668W4287399050What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.