ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2021
Application of the i-PARIHS framework in the implementation of speech recognition technology as a way of addressing documentation burden within a mental health context.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability of Health Information Technology by Health Care Professionals: Where We Are Now and How We Can Fill the Gap.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- Collecting and Sharing Person-Centered AI Clinical Summaries Across Frailty Services Provided by the National Health Service and Voluntary, Community, and Social Enterprise: Protocol for a Co-Design and Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Assessing the Impact on Electronic Health Record Burden After Five Years of Physician Engagement in a Canadian Mental Health Organization: Mixed-Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Tackling the Burden of Electronic Health Record Use Among Physicians in a Mental Health Setting: Physician Engagement Strategy.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Documentation burden continues to be a critical issue in the adoption of comprehensive electronic health record systems. This case study demonstrates how the i-PARIHS framework can be applied to support the implementation of interventions in reducing documentation and EHR-related burden in a mental health context. As part of pre-adoption implementation activities for Speech Recognition Technology (SRT), a cross-sectional survey was conducted with physicians, residents, and fellows at an academic mental health hospital to explore their perceptions on SRT. Open-ended responses and follow-up interviews explored challenges and concerns on using SRT in practice. Through an analysis using the i-PARIHS framework, key considerations were mapped across the four components of the framework. This study demonstrates the value of applying well-established implementation frameworks, such as the i-PARIHS framework, in mitigating challenges related to documentation burden. Future studies should explore how implementation frameworks can be systematically embedded in addressing EHR-related burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35308937PMC8861762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.