Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308927›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2021

Reducing Physicians' Cognitive Load During Chart Review: A Problem-Oriented Summary of the Patient Electronic Record.

Jennifer J Liang, Ching-Huei Tsou, Bharath Dandala, Ananya Poddar, Venkata Joopudi, Diwakar Mahajan, John Prager, Preethi Raghavan, Michele Payne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Capturing Individual-level Social Determinants from Clinical Text.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer J LiangIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
Ching-Huei TsouIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
Bharath DandalaIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
Ananya PoddarIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
Venkata JoopudiIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
Diwakar MahajanIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
John PragerIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
Preethi RaghavanIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
Michele PayneIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overabundance of information within electronic health records (EHRs) has resulted in a need for automated systems to mitigate the cognitive burden on physicians utilizing today's EHR systems. We present ProSPER, a Problem-oriented Summary of the Patient Electronic Record that displays a patient summary centered around an auto-generated problem list and disease-specific views for chronic conditions. ProSPER was developed using 1,500 longitudinal patient records from two large multi-specialty medical groups in the United States, and leverages multiple natural language processing (NLP) components targeting various fundamental (e.g. syntactic analysis), clinical (e.g. adverse drug event extraction) and summarizing (e.g. problem list generation) tasks. We report evaluation results for each component and discuss how specific components address existing physician challenges in reviewing EHR data. This work demonstrates the need to leverage holistic information in EHRs to build a comprehensive summarization application, and the potential for NLP-based applications to support physicians and improve clinical care.

Indexed as

PhysiciansCognitionElectronic Health RecordsElectronicsHumansNatural Language ProcessingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35308927
PMCPMC8861663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.