Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308925›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2021

Design and development of an informatics-driven implementation research framework for primary care studies.

Jiancheng Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Multimodal Data Hybrid Fusion and Natural Language Processing for Clinical Prediction Models.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jiancheng YeFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digitalization of the healthcare systems has resulted in a deluge of big data and has prompted the rapid growth of data science in medicine. Many informatics tools, such as data science, which is the field of study dedicated to the principled extraction of knowledge from complex data, can also introduce benefits into implementation science, quality improvement (QI), and primary care research. The increased amount of primary care QI initiatives, availability of practice facilitation-related data, the need for better evidence-based care, and the complexity of challenges make the use of data science techniques and data-driven research particularly appealing to primary care. Recent advances in the usability, applicability, and interpretability of data science models offer promising applications to implementation science. Despite the increasing number of studies and publications in the field, thus far there have been few examples of combining informatics and implementation framework to facilitate primary care studies. We designed and developed an informatics-driven implementation research framework to provide a coherent rationale and justification of the complex interrelationships among features, strategies, and outcomes. The proposed framework is a principle-guided tool designed to improve the specification, reproducibility, and testable causal pathways involved in implementation research projects in primary care settings.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareQuality ImprovementBig DataHumansPrimary Health CareReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35308925
PMCPMC8861697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.