Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308815›Full record

ArticleNordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT2021

Let's talk about sex: Discourses on sexual relations, sugar dating and "prostitution-like" behaviour in drug treatment for young people.

Ditte Andersen, Ida Friis Thing

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ditte AndersenVIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2085-3305
Ida Friis ThingUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKVIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sexual relations are a recurrent theme in drug treatment that aims for a holistic inclusion of concerns considered important in young people's lives. Nevertheless, it remains understudied how counselors attend to this theme. Aim: To investigate the discourses on sexual relations in drug treatment for young people provided by the Scandinavian welfare state of Denmark. Analysis: Drawing on qualitative interviews with 16 counselors the analysis first identifies three discourses that legitimize sexual relations as a theme in drug treatment by linking the theme to a) pleasure, b) risks, and c) problems. These discourses legitimize the theme by constructing sexual relations as part of the good life, as potentially harmful, or as related to past trauma triggering present problems. Second, the analysis identifies a gendered storyline on sexual relations in exchange economies, e.g., sugar dating, described by some counselors as "prostitution-like" behavior. Findings: The gendered storyline is almost exclusively linked to young women's behavior and produces a gendered shame by indicating deviant femininity. Simultaneously, the storyline taboos how the young men may experience vulnerable sexual relations in exchange economies. Conclusion: Alternative discourses can provide a broader repertoire of subject positions to the benefit of all genders.

Indexed as

discoursegenderholistic drug treatmentpleasurerisksexsexual relationsshamestorylinesugar dating

Identifiers

PMID35308815
PMCPMC8900188
OpenAlexW3174984271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.