ArticleCureus2022
Blood Ordering and Transfusion Practices: An Insight Toward Better Utility of Blood Products.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood Component Utilization and Discard Patterns in Telangana, India: A Three-Year Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Blood Product Management: A Comprehensive Analysis in a Trauma Center Hospital.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of indicators for nursing management in blood transfusion.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Analyzing RBC Transfusion Practices Using Quality Indicators: A Retrospective Transfusion Audit.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background An adequate supply of quality blood products is the backbone of any hospital. To maintain it, the utilization and wastage of the products should be closely monitored. Objective To determine the crossmatch to transfusion (C/T) ratio, transfusion probability (%T), and transfusion index (Ti) of packed red blood cells and to review the use of platelets. Materials and methods A total of 6,326 hematological patients receiving packed red blood cells were included in the study. The random donor platelets that were prepared during this period were also included to know the actual utilization of platelets. Results A total of 26,146 crossmatches were requested for these 6,326 patients in three years. Out of these, 26,024 units were issued and transfused to the patients. The CT ratio of our data was calculated to be 1.00, the transfusion probability was found to be 98.1%, and the transfusion index was computed to be 0.99. For random donor platelets, 37,162 were prepared from whole blood during this period, while 30,971 platelets were transfused to the patients. Conclusion The overall results of our analysis showed proper utilization of blood products at our institution. The wastage was considered to be minimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.