ArticleCureus2022
Outcomes in High Perianal Fistula Repair Using Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Compared With Seton Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Failure rates and complications of four sphincter-sparing techniques for the treatment of fistula-in-ano: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Cutting seton for the treatment of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of anal fistula plug and endoanal advancement flap repair treating the complex anal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Assessing the suitability of video-assisted anal fistula treatment for obese patients compared to conventional surgery: a question worth investigating.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Rhode Island medical journal (2013) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Anal fistula, or fistula-in-ano, is a chronic abnormal communication between the epithelialized surface of the anal canal and the perianal skin. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is a novel, minimally invasive, and sphincter-saving alternative to traditional seton use. This study aimed to determine the short-term and long-term outcomes of VAAFT compared with seton treatment. Material and methods This randomized control trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, from August 2014 to July 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to either the VAAFT group or the seton group, and postoperative outcomes were assessed for up to three years. Results The study included 80 patients (64 men and 16 women) with a mean age of 39.1 ± 11.2 years. The most common type of fistula was a transsphincteric fistula (n=36, 45%). The mean duration of surgery was significantly longer in the VAAFT group (78.6 minutes) compared with the seton group (36.97 minutes; p=0.000). The mean pain score was significantly higher in the VAAFT group (4.22) compared to the seton group (2.82, p=0.000). The mean time to return to work was shorter in the VAAFT group (7.4 days) than in the seton group (9.2 days, p=0.000). The mean healing time was significantly shorter for patients treated with VAAFT (5.75 weeks) than for those treated with a seton (9.7 weeks; p=0.000). Fistula recurrence after one, two, or three years was not significantly different between groups, and neither group had incidences of anal incontinence. Conclusions VAAFT is associated with earlier healing time and earlier return to work than the traditional seton technique, with no significant difference in fistula recurrence. VAAFT is minimally invasive and, when used in patients where indicated, allows for a prompter return to routine life for the patients, which is an optimal outcome for both patients and physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.