Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308616›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

A Preliminary Study of the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Babak Babakhani, Narges Hoseini Tabatabaei, Kost Elisevich, Narges Sadeghbeigi, Mojtaba Barzegar, Neda Mohammadi Mobarakeh, Fatemeh Eyvazi, Zahra Khazaeipour, Arman Taheri, Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neuromodulation of the central nervous system for facial pain.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pathophysiology and Management of Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Babak BabakhaniBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Narges Hoseini TabatabaeiMedical School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kost ElisevichDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Spectrum Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, United States.
Narges SadeghbeigiNational Brain Mapping Laboratory, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba BarzegarNational Brain Mapping Laboratory, Tehran, Iran.
Neda Mohammadi MobarakehMedical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh EyvaziResearch Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Advanced Medical Technologies and Equipment Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra KhazaeipourBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arman TaheriMedical School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad-Reza Nazem-ZadehMedical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRLaboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale · FRMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with treatment-refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and examine the utility of neuroimaging methods in identifying markers of such efficacy. Six patients with classical TN refractory to maximal medical treatment, underwent tDCS (three cases inhibitory/cathodic and three cases excitatory/anodic stimulation). All patients underwent pre- and posttreatment functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during block-design tasks (i.e., Pain, Pain + tDCS, tDCS) as well as single-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisition. The precise locations of tDCS electrodes were identified by neuronavigation. Five therapeutic tDCS sessions were carried out for each patient with either anodic or cathodic applications. The Numeric Rating Scale of pain (NRS) and the Headache Disability Index (HDI) were used to score the subjective efficacy of treatment. Altered activity of regional sites was identified by fMRI and associated changes in the spinothalamocortical sensory tract (STCT) were measured by the dMRI indices of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). Fiber counts of the bilateral trigeminal root entry zone (REZ) were performed as an added measure of fiber loss or recovery. All patients experienced a significant reduction in pain scores with a substantial decline in HDI (

Indexed as

brain stimulationdMRI (diffusion magnetic resonance imaging)fMRIneural basespaintDCS—transcranial direct current stimulationtreatment efficacytrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID35308616
PMCPMC8931809
OpenAlexW4214879588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.