Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308602›Full record

ArticleAPL photonics2021

Computational interference microscopy enabled by deep learning.

Yuheng Jiao, Yuchen R He, Mikhail E Kandel, Xiaojun Liu, Wenlong Lu, Gabriel Popescu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APL photonics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On the use of deep learning for phase recovery.Light, science & applications · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuheng JiaoQuantitative Light Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Yuchen R HeQuantitative Light Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Mikhail E KandelQuantitative Light Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Xiaojun LiuState Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Wenlong LuState Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Gabriel PopescuQuantitative Light Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Quantitative histopathology for cancer prognosis using quantitative phase imaging on stained tissuesR01CA238191 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ANASTASIO, MARK A, ELICEIRI, KEVIN WILLIAM · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
High accuracy optical growth assay of 3D cellular systemsR01GM129709 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BASHIR, RASHID · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238191NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) has been widely applied in characterizing cells and tissues. Spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM) is a highly sensitive QPI method due to its partially coherent illumination and common path interferometry geometry. However, SLIM's acquisition rate is limited because of the four-frame phase-shifting scheme. On the other hand, off-axis methods such as diffraction phase microscopy (DPM) allow for single-shot QPI. However, the laser-based DPM system is plagued by spatial noise due to speckles and multiple reflections. In a parallel development, deep learning was proven valuable in the field of bioimaging, especially due to its ability to translate one form of contrast into another. Here, we propose using deep learning to produce synthetic, SLIM-quality, and high-sensitivity phase maps from DPM using single-shot images as the input. We used an inverted microscope with its two ports connected to the DPM and SLIM modules such that we have access to the two types of images on the same field of view. We constructed a deep learning model based on U-net and trained on over 1000 pairs of DPM and SLIM images. The model learned to remove the speckles in laser DPM and overcame the background phase noise in both the test set and new data. The average peak signal-to-noise ratio, Pearson correlation coefficient, and structural similarity index measure were 29.97, 0.79, and 0.82 for the test dataset. Furthermore, we implemented the neural network inference into the live acquisition software, which now allows a DPM user to observe in real-time an extremely low-noise phase image. We demonstrated this principle of computational interference microscopy imaging using blood smears, as they contain both erythrocytes and leukocytes, under static and dynamic conditions.

Identifiers

PMID35308602
PMCPMC8931864
OpenAlexW3142701555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.