ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022
Prevention of self-induced re-injury to ruptured globe with a surgically fixated plastic eye shield.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Open globe injury is an emergent, vision threatening condition. To ensure the best possible visual outcome after an open globe, it is essential to protect the eye from further trauma during the critical period of healing. In cases where the open globe is caused by repeated self-mutilation, long term prevention of re-injury must also be considered and can pose a significant challenge. Observations: Here we describe a 68-year-old male with a history of severe intellectual disability. The patient presented after an episode of eye self-mutilation, resulting in an open globe injury. After being taken to the operating room for emergent repair of the eye, the primary concern was how to prevent re-injury. Ultimately, as an alternative to the long-term use of restraints, the decision was made to fixate a plastic eye shield over the affected eye using sutures. The eye shield prevented any unwanted manipulation of the eye while implanted, despite several attempts. After 18 days, the eye shield was forcibly removed by the patient. However, this allowed adequate healing time, and there has not been any repeated damage to the eye since. Conclusions and Importance: Our proposal to suture a plastic eye shield to the orbital rims of a patient is an attempt to allow the eye to heal while avoiding prolonged use of restraints and minimizing long-term hospital stays. This intervention may prove to be beneficial for the population of psychologically or cognitively impaired individuals, as they are often implicated in cases of self-inflicted ocular trauma. To our knowledge, this is the first description of the use of this method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.