Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308462›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2022

The Future of Critical Care: Optimizing Technologies and a Learning Healthcare System to Potentiate a More Humanistic Approach to Critical Care.

Heather Meissen, Michelle Ng Gong, An-Kwok Ian Wong, Jerry J Zimmerman, Nalini Nadkarni, Sandra L Kane-Gil, Javier Amador-Castaneda, Heatherlee Bailey, Samuel M Brown, Ashley D DePriest and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From theory to practice: implementing an education bundle for neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in the intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Asynchrony index modified: An improved tool for estimating the quality of patient-ventilator interaction.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Role of artificial intelligence in critical care nutrition support and research.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ICU without borders.Critical care (London, England) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Heather MeissenEmory Critical Care Center, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Michelle Ng GongDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
An-Kwok Ian WongDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Jerry J ZimmermanDepartments of Medicine and Anesthesiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Nalini NadkarniDepartment of Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Sandra L Kane-GilUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA.
Javier Amador-CastanedaNew York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Heatherlee BaileyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Samuel M BrownIntermountain Medical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Ashley D DePriestNutrition and Food Services, Wellstar Health System, Marietta, GA.
Ifeoma Mary EcheDepartment of Pharmacy, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Mayur NarayanDivision of Trauma, Burns, Critical and Acute Care, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Jose Javier ProvencioDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottsville, VA.
Nneka O SederstromCenter for Bioethics, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN.
Jonathan SevranskyEmory Critical Care Center, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Jordan TremperCommonSpirit Health, Tacoma, WA.
Rebecca A AslaksonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Emory Healthcare · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USDuke University · USDurham VA Medical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While technological innovations are the invariable crux of speculation about the future of critical care, they cannot replace the clinician at the bedside. This article summarizes the work of the Society of Critical Care Medicine-appointed multiprofessional task for the Future of Critical Care. The Task Force notes that critical care practice will be transformed by novel technologies, integration of artificial intelligence decision support algorithms, and advances in seamless data operationalization across diverse healthcare systems and geographic regions and within federated datasets. Yet, new technologies will be relevant and meaningful only if they improve the very human endeavor of caring for someone who is critically ill.

Indexed as

critical carefutureinnovationspatient-centered caretechnology

Identifiers

PMID35308462
PMCPMC8926065
OpenAlexW4220821109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.