Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308458›Full record

ArticlePsychological injury and law2022

Can the Rorschach be Administered Remotely? A Review of Options and a Pilot Study Using a Newly Developed R-PAS App.

Francesca Ales, Gregory J Meyer, Joni L Mihura, Andrea Corgiat Loia, Sara Pasqualini, Alessandro Zennaro, Luciano Giromini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological injury and law, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesca AlesDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10123 Turin, TO Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8259-4049
Gregory J MeyerDepartment of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH USA.
Joni L MihuraDepartment of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH USA.
Andrea Corgiat LoiaDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10123 Turin, TO Italy.
Sara PasqualiniDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10123 Turin, TO Italy.
Alessandro ZennaroDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10123 Turin, TO Italy.
Luciano GirominiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10123 Turin, TO Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has required psychologists to adopt measures like physical distancing and mask wearing, though other safety procedures such as travel restrictions or prohibitions on in-person practice and research have fostered the use of tele-health tools. In this article, we review options for using the Rorschach task via videoconference and provide preliminary data from using a new electronic app for remote R-PAS administration to determine whether the remote administration in an electronic form yields different information than in-person administration with the cards in hand. As a pilot study, our focus is on the "first factor" of all Rorschach scores, i.e., complexity. Data were collected from 60 adult Italian community volunteers, and statistical analyses evaluated the extent to which the average complexity score significantly departed from R-PAS normative expectations (SS = 100), accompanied by Bayesian likelihoods for supporting the null hypothesis. Results suggest that the general level of complexity shown by the test-takers when administered the Rorschach remotely with the new R-PAS app closely resembles that previously observed using "standard" in-person procedures. Tentative analyses of other R-PAS scores suggested normative departures that could be due to the effects of the app, testing at home, or responses to the pandemic. We offer recommendations for future research and discuss practical implications.

Indexed as

AssessmentPersonalityRorschachR-PASTele-health

Identifiers

PMID35308458
PMCPMC8923744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.