Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308436›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Pakistan: A cross-sectional online survey.

Zaboor Ahmed, Khurram Khaliq Bhinder, Amna Tariq, Muhammad Junaid Tahir, Qasim Mehmood, Muhammad Saad Tabassum, Muna Malik, Sana Aslam, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Zohaib Yousaf

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Zaboor AhmedLahore General Hospital, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Khurram Khaliq BhinderShifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Amna TariqLahore General Hospital, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Junaid TahirLahore General Hospital, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Qasim MehmoodKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Saad TabassumLahore General Hospital, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Muna MalikCombined Military Hospital (CMH), Lahore, Pakistan.
Sana AslamBenazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharDow University of Health Sciences-Ojha Campus, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zohaib YousafHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Lahore General Hospital · PKBenazir Bhutto Hospital · PKCombined Military Hospital · PKDow University of Health Sciences · PKHamad Medical Corporation · QAKing Edward Medical University · PKShifa International Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of Artificial intelligence (AI) has gained popularity during the last few decades and its use in medicine is increasing globally. Developing countries like Pakistan are lagging in the implementation of AI-based solutions in healthcare. There is a need to incorporate AI in the health system which may help not only in expediting diagnosis and management but also injudicious resource allocation. Objective: To determine the knowledge, attitude, and practice of AI among doctors and medical students in Pakistan. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire-based survey regarding demographic details, knowledge, perception, and practice of AI. A sample of 470 individuals including doctors and medical students were selected using the convenient sampling technique. The chi-square test was applied for the comparison of variables. Results: Out of 470 individuals, 223(47.45%) were doctors and 247(52.55%) were medical students. Among these, 165(74%) doctors and 170(68.8%) medical students had a basic knowledge of AI but only 61(27.3%) doctors and 48(19.4%) students were aware of its medical applications. Regarding attitude, 237(76.7%) individuals supported AI's inclusion in curriculum, 368(78.3%) and 305(64.9%), 281(59.8%) and 269(57.2%) acknowledged its necessity in radiology, pathology, and COVID-19 pandemic respectively. Conclusion: The majority of doctors and medical students lack knowledge about AI and its applications, but had a positive view of AI in the field of medicine and were willing to adopt it.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCurriculumDeep learningMachine learningMedical students

Identifiers

PMID35308436
PMCPMC8928127
OpenAlexW4221097940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.