Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308431›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Perioperative patient satisfaction and its predictors following surgery and anesthesia services in North Shewa, Ethiopia. A multicenter prospective cross-sectional study.

Melaku Bantie Fetene, Samuel Debas Bayable, Emebet Seyum Wendimu, Kokeb Desta Belehu, Agmuas Aschale Almaw, Peniel Kena Dula, Bezaye Zemedkun Bejiga

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Strengthening caesarean birth: Sub-Saharan Africa health system evaluation: Scoping review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melaku Bantie FeteneDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.
Samuel Debas BayableDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia.
Emebet Seyum WendimuDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.
Kokeb Desta BelehuDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.
Agmuas Aschale AlmawDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.
Peniel Kena DulaDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.
Bezaye Zemedkun BejigaDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.
Debre Berhan University · ETDebre Markos University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient satisfaction is a relative and complex concept, that mainly depends on the balance between patient's expected and perceived quality of care. Measuring patient satisfaction is important to assess the continuous quality and improvement in anesthesia services, highly affected by anesthetist patient interaction, perioperative anesthetic management and postoperative follow up. The aim of this study was to assess perioperative adult surgical patient satisfaction and its predictors following surgery and anesthesia services in three general Hospitals in a low income country. Methods: Multicenter prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in all general hospitals found in North Shewa Amhara Regional State hospitals from February to April 2021. After obtaining ethical approval from the institutional review board, 411 willing patients have participated in this study. Data was collected by chart review and face-to-face questions after 24 h of the postoperative period. The level of patient satisfaction was measured via a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were presented in frequency and percentage. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fit to identify the variables, which had an association with the outcome variable. P-values<0.2 for bivariate and <0.05 for multivariate and adjusted odds ratio were used to consider statistically significant. This study is registered with research unique identifying number of "researchregistry7502". Result: Among 411 participants with a response rate of 96.9%; 61.8% were females and 54.7% had surgery under spinal anesthesia. The overall patient satisfaction was 64%. History of anesthesia exposure, premedication, spinal anesthesia and postoperative pain were predictive factors for patient satisfaction after perioperative anesthesia service with AOR (95% CI) P value of 2.311(1.244-4.294)0.008, 2.213(1.277-3.835) 0.005, 2.707(1.458-5.029) 0.002 and 2.430(1.452-4.065) <0.001 respectively. Conclusion: In general the overall patient satisfaction towards perioperative anesthesia service was low in contrast to many previous studies. Factors that cause dissatisfaction should be prevented or better treated and every stakeholder should be trained and participated.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaASA, American Society of AnesthesiologistsGA, General AnesthesiaLeiden preoperative care patient satisfaction questionnaire (LPPSq)LPPSQ, Leiden Perioperative care Patient Satisfaction QuestionerPatient satisfactionPerioperative anesthesia serviceSA, Spinal AnesthesiaSTROCSS, Strengthening The Reporting of Cohort, Cross-sectional and Case-control studies in Surgery

Identifiers

PMID35308431
PMCPMC8928135
OpenAlexW4221095160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.