Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308425›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on artificial intelligence2021

A Survey on Multi-View Clustering.

Guoqing Chao, Shiliang Sun, Jinbo Bi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ensemble clustering: A practical tutorial.Behavior research methods · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring Anti-Aging Literature viaAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How our understanding of memory replay evolves.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. VIEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guoqing ChaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, PR China.
Shiliang SunSchool of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai, Shanghai 200062 China.
Jinbo BiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA.

Funding

Multi-level statistical classification of substance use disorderR01DA051922 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI BI, JINBO, LI, CHIANG-SHAN RAY · 2020 to 2023
$1.8M
Quantitative methods to subtype drug dependence and detect novel genetic variantsR01DA037349 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI BI, JINBO · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
SCH: Personalized Depression Treatment Support by Mobile Sensor Analytics R01MH119678 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI BI, JINBO, KAMATH, JAYESH · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
Classifying addictions using machine learning analysis of multidimensional dataK02DA043063 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI BI, JINBO · 2017 to 2021
$809k
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA043063NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037349NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051922NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustering is a machine learning paradigm of dividing sample subjects into a number of groups such that subjects in the same groups are more similar to those in other groups. With advances in information acquisition technologies, samples can frequently be viewed from different angles or in different modalities, generating multi-view data. Multi-view clustering, that clusters subjects into subgroups using multi-view data, has attracted more and more attentions. Although MVC methods have been developed rapidly, there has not been enough survey to summarize and analyze the current progress. Therefore, we propose a novel taxonomy of the MVC approaches. Similar to other machine learning methods, we categorize them into generative and discriminative classes. In discriminative class, based on the way of view integration, we split it further into five groups: Common Eigenvector Matrix, Common Coefficient Matrix, Common Indicator Matrix, Direct Combination and Combination After Projection. Furthermore, we relate MVC to other topics: multi-view representation, ensemble clustering, multi-task clustering, multi-view supervised and semi-supervised learning. Several representative real-world applications are elaborated for practitioners. Some benchmark multi-view datasets are introduced and representative MVC algorithms from each group are empirically evaluated to analyze how they perform on benchmark datasets. To promote future development of MVC approaches, we point out several open problems that may require further investigation and thorough examination.

Indexed as

canonical correlation analysisclusteringdata miningk-meansmachine learningMulti-view learningnonnegative matrix factorizationspectral clusteringsubspace clusteringsurvey

Identifiers

PMID35308425
PMCPMC8925043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.