Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308309›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Healthcare workers' views on mandatory SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the UK: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods analysis from the UK-REACH study.

Katherine Woolf, Mayuri Gogoi, Christopher A Martin, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, I Chris McManus, Anna L Guyatt, Carl Melbourne, Luke Bryant and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Providers During the First 10 Months of Vaccine Availability: Scoping Review.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine WoolfResearch Department of Medical Education, University College London Medical School, UK.
Mayuri GogoiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Christopher A MartinDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Padmasayee PapineniEaling Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Southall, UK.
Susie LagrataUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Laura B NellumsDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK.
I Chris McManusResearch Department of Medical Education, University College London Medical School, UK.
Anna L GuyattDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Carl MelbourneGenetic Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Luke BryantDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Amit GuptaOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Catherine JohnDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sue CarrLeicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, UK.
Martin D TobinDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sandra SimpsonNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Bindu GregaryLancashire Clinical Research Facility, Royal Preston Hospital, UK.
Avinash AujayebRespiratory Department, Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital, UK.
Stephen ZingweResearch and Development Department, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust.
Rubina RezaDerbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Centre for Research and Development, Kingsway Hospital site, UK.
Laura J GrayDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Kamlesh KhuntiDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK.
Manish PareekDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
UK-REACH Study Collaborative Group
University of Leicester · GBUniversity College London · GBBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBEaling Hospital · GBGeneral Medical Council · GBNorthumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital · GBNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Preston Hospital · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

HSRD VA TPP 10-008Medical Research Council MC_PC_19004Medical Research Council MR/P00167X/1Medical Research Council MR/V027549/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several countries now have mandatory SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for healthcare workers (HCWs) or the general population. HCWs' views on this are largely unknown. Using data from the nationwide UK-REACH study we aimed to understand UK HCW's views on improving SARS-CoV-2 vaccination coverage, including mandatory vaccination. Methods: Between 21st April and 26th June 2021, we administered an online questionnaire via email to 17 891 UK HCWs recruited as part of a longitudinal cohort from across the UK who had previously responded to a baseline questionnaire (primarily recruited through email) as part of the United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) nationwide prospective cohort study. We categorised responses to a free-text question "What should society do if people do not get vaccinated against COVID-19?" using qualitative content analysis. We collapsed categories into a binary variable: favours mandatory vaccination or not, using logistic regression to calculate its demographic predictors, and its occupational, health, and attitudinal predictors adjusted for demographics. Findings: Of 5633 questionnaire respondents, 3235 answered the free text question. Median age of free text responders was 47 years (IQR 36-56) and 2705 (74.3%) were female. 18% ( Interpretation: Only one in six of the HCWs in this large, diverse, UK-wide sample favoured mandatory vaccination. Building trust, educating, and supporting HCWs who are hesitant about vaccination may be more acceptable, effective, and equitable. Funding: MRC-UK Research and Innovation grant (MR/V027549/1) and the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Core funding was also provided by NIHR Biomedical Research Centres.

Identifiers

PMID35308309
PMCPMC8923694
OpenAlexW4220670144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.