Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308251›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Chlorin e6-Induced Photodynamic Effect Polarizes the Macrophage Into an M1 Phenotype Through Oxidative DNA Damage and Activation of STING.

Ting-Ting Yu, Ning Han, Liu-Gen Li, Xing-Chun Peng, Qi-Rui Li, Hua-Zhen Xu, Xi-Yong Wang, Zi-Yi Yang, Xiao Chen, Mei-Fang Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chlorin e6-mediated sublethal photodynamic therapy modulates biomarkers in a murine lung cancer-derived in vitro cancer-associated fibroblast model.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ting-Ting YuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Ning HanSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Liu-Gen LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Xing-Chun PengSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Qi-Rui LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Hua-Zhen XuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xi-Yong WangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Zi-Yi YangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Xiao ChenDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Mei-Fang WangDepartment of Respiratory, Taihe Hospital of Shiyan, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Tong-Fei LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Hubei University of Medicine · CNTaihe Hospital · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) serves as an immunosuppressive agent in the malignant tumor microenvironment, facilitating the development and metastasis of lung cancer. The photodynamic effect destabilizes cellular homeostasis owing to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in the enhanced pro-inflammatory function of immunocytes. In our previous study, the Ce6-mediated photodynamic effect was found to have kept the viability of macrophages and to remodel them into the M1 phenotype. However, the mechanism remains unrevealed. The present study now explores the mechanism of photodynamic therapy (PDT)-mediated reprogramming of macrophages. As expected, Ce6-mediated PDT was capable of generating reactive oxygen species, which was continuously degraded, causing "low intensity" damage to DNA and thereby triggering subsequent DNA damage response in macrophages. The autophagy was thus observed in Ce6-treated macrophages and was shown to protect cells from being photodynamically apoptotic. More importantly, Ce6 PDT could activate the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) molecule, a sensor of DNA damage, which could activate the downstream nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) upon activation, mediating the polarization of macrophages towards the M1 phenotype thereupon. In addition, inhibition of ROS induced by PDT attenuated the DNA damage, STING activation, and M1-phenotype reprogramming. Furthermore, the silence of the STING weakened Ce6 treatment-mediated M1 remodeling of macrophages as well. Altogether, these findings indicate the Ce6-induced photodynamic effect polarizes macrophages into an M1 phenotype through oxidative DNA damage and subsequent activation of the STING. This work reveals the crucial mechanism by which photodynamic therapy regulates the macrophage phenotype and also provides a novel intervenable signaling target for remodeling macrophages into the M1 phenotype.

Indexed as

autophagyDNA damage response (DDR)macrophagesphotodynamic effectreactive oxygen species (ROS)STING molecule

Identifiers

PMID35308251
PMCPMC8927874
OpenAlexW4214867584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.