Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308170›Full record

ReviewOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2022

A Review of Bile Acid Metabolism and Signaling in Cognitive Dysfunction-Related Diseases.

Ze-Bin Weng, Yuan-Rong Chen, Jin-Tao Lv, Min-Xin Wang, Zheng-Yuan Chen, Wen Zhou, Xin-Chun Shen, Li-Bin Zhan, Fang Wang

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hepatic interoception in health and disease.Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ze-Bin WengSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine & School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7278-8851
Yuan-Rong ChenCollege of Food Science and Engineering/Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety/Key Laboratory of Grains and Oils Quality Control and Processing, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-7327
Jin-Tao LvSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine & School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-8303
Min-Xin WangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine & School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7006-0947
Zheng-Yuan ChenSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine & School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4923-9429
Wen ZhouSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine & School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7718-4627
Xin-Chun ShenCollege of Food Science and Engineering/Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety/Key Laboratory of Grains and Oils Quality Control and Processing, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-1587
Li-Bin ZhanThe Innovation Engineering Technology Center of Chinese Medicine, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-7158
Fang WangCollege of Food Science and Engineering/Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety/Key Laboratory of Grains and Oils Quality Control and Processing, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5280-2967
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNNanjing University of Finance and Economics · CNLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bile acids are commonly known as one of the vital metabolites derived from cholesterol. The role of bile acids in glycolipid metabolism and their mechanisms in liver and cholestatic diseases have been well studied. In addition, bile acids also serve as ligands of signal molecules such as FXR, TGR5, and S1PR2 to regulate some physiological processes in vivo. Recent studies have found that bile acids signaling may also play a critical role in the central nervous system. Evidence showed that some bile acids have exhibited neuroprotective effects in experimental animal models and clinical trials of many cognitive dysfunction-related diseases. Besides, alterations in bile acid metabolisms well as the expression of different bile acid receptors have been discovered as possible biomarkers for prognosis tools in multiple cognitive dysfunction-related diseases. This review summarizes biosynthesis and regulation of bile acids, receptor classification and characteristics, receptor agonists and signaling transduction, and recent findings in cognitive dysfunction-related diseases.

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsCognitive DysfunctionAnimalsLipid MetabolismLiverSignal TransductionBile Acids and Salts

Identifiers

PMID35308170
PMCPMC8933076
OpenAlexW4220908394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.