ArticleDisease markers2022
Identification of CCL20 and LCN2 as Efficient Serological Tools for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum CC-Chemokine Profiling in Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease: Focus on MIP-3α/CCL20 as a Biomarker of Disease Severity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- The chemokine CCL20 can assist AFP in serological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Blood biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- The role of novel adipokines in hepatocellular carcinoma progression: a mini review.American journal of cancer research · 2024Review
- Biological function analysis of ARHGAP39 as an independent prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma.Aging · 2023Article
- Recent advances in optical aptasensors for biomarkers in early diagnosis and prognosis monitoring of hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To discover a more powerful diagnostic tool for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: 16 extracellularly located candidates were selected by analyzing the expression array datasets in GEO. 10 of them were validated in clinical samples by ELISA. Differences of each variable were compared by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test. CCL20 and LCN2 were determined in all samples (HCC, 167; liver cirrhosis, 106; and healthy control, 106) and finally chosen for the construction of the combination model by binary logistic regression. The models were first built using a comprehensive control, including both liver cirrhosis (LC) and healthy donors. Then, the models were rebuilt by using the LC group alone as a control. ROC analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of each indicator. Results: Levels of CCL20 and LCN2 in HCC sera were significantly higher than those in all controls. Using the comprehensive control, ROC curves showed that the optimum diagnostic cutoff of the CCL20 and LCN2 combination was 0.443 (area under curve (AUC) of 0.927 (95% CI 0.896-0.951), sensitivity of 0.808, specificity of 0.892, and accuracy of 0.859). For detection of HCC from LC control, the optimum diagnostic cutoff was 0.590 (AUC of 0.919 (95% CI 0.880-0.948), sensitivity of 0.814, specificity of 0.868, and accuracy of 0.834). Furthermore, the model maintained diagnostic accuracy for patients with HCC in the early stage, with the sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.77 from LC control, yet the AFP only reached 0.5 and 0.67, respectively. Conclusion: A combination model composed of CCL20 and LCN2 may serve as a more efficient tool for distinguishing HCC from nonmalignant liver diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.