Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35308059›Full record

ArticleApplied network science2022

Ranking of communities in multiplex spatiotemporal models of brain dynamics.

James B Wilsenach, Catherine E Warnaby, Charlotte M Deane, Gesine D Reinert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied network science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James B WilsenachWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8214-9009
Catherine E WarnabyWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Charlotte M DeaneDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gesine D ReinertDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R006423/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a relatively new field, network neuroscience has tended to focus on aggregate behaviours of the brain averaged over many successive experiments or over long recordings in order to construct robust brain models. These models are limited in their ability to explain dynamic state changes in the brain which occurs spontaneously as a result of normal brain function. Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) trained on neuroimaging time series data have since arisen as a method to produce dynamical models that are easy to train but can be difficult to fully parametrise or analyse. We propose an interpretation of these neural HMMs as multiplex brain state graph models we term Hidden Markov Graph Models. This interpretation allows for dynamic brain activity to be analysed using the full repertoire of network analysis techniques. Furthermore, we propose a general method for selecting HMM hyperparameters in the absence of external data, based on the principle of maximum entropy, and use this to select the number of layers in the multiplex model. We produce a new tool for determining important communities of brain regions using a spatiotemporal random walk-based procedure that takes advantage of the underlying Markov structure of the model. Our analysis of real multi-subject fMRI data provides new results that corroborate the modular processing hypothesis of the brain at rest as well as contributing new evidence of functional overlap between and within dynamic brain state communities. Our analysis pipeline provides a way to characterise dynamic network activity of the brain under novel behaviours or conditions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41109-022-00454-2.

Indexed as

Community rankingGenerative modelsModel selectionMultiplex networksNetworks neuroscienceSpatiotemporal networks

Identifiers

PMID35308059
PMCPMC8921068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.