Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35307974›Full record

ArticleNursing open2022

Student nurses' views on shift patterns: What do they prefer and why? Results from a Tweetchat.

Chiara Dall'Ora, Jessica Sainsbury, Chris Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chiara Dall'OraNIHR ARC Wessex, Wessex, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6858-3535
Jessica SainsburySchool of Health Sciences, University Of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Chris AllenSchool of Health Sciences, University Of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1296-8989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe main aim of the study was to understand student nurses' views around shift patterns.

designQualitative study.

methodWe held a Tweetchat in May 2019, where we asked questions around the frequency of 12-hr shifts working on placement; schedule flexibility while on placement; which shift patterns they preferred and why. Data from the Tweetchat were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes from initial codes.

resultsSeventy-three nursing students participated in the Tweetchat. The majority reported that they work 12-hr shifts on placements, particularly when based in a hospital. We identified three themes: 'Achieving a personal equilibrium'; 'Meeting the needs of the care environment'; 'Factors affecting negotiation capacity'. Data highlighted a conflict for most students, where they preferred 12-hr shifts because of more time off for study, paid work and leisure, while acknowledging 12-hr shifts negatively affected their fatigue, exhaustion and led them to follow a poor diet and neglect exercise and sleep.

Indexed as

NursesSleep Disorders, Circadian RhythmStudents, NursingFatigueHumansWork Schedule Tolerance12-hr shiftsshift workstudent nursesthematic analysisTwitter

Identifiers

PMID35307974
PMCPMC8994946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.