ArticleThe plant genome2022
A multi-trait multi-locus stepwise approach for conducting GWAS on correlated traits.
Article in The plant genome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide association insights into the genomic regions controlling vegetative and oil production traits in Acrocomia aculeata.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Epistasis and pleiotropy-induced variation for plant breeding.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Selective sweep and GWAS provide insights into adaptive variation ofForestry research · 2024Article
- Pleiotropic genetic association analysis with multiple phenotypes using multivariate response best-subset selection.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Combining GS-assisted GWAS and transcriptome analysis to mine candidate genes for nitrogen utilization efficiency in Populus cathayana.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Multi-locus genome-wide association study of fusarium head blight in relation to days to anthesis and plant height in a spring wheat association panel.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- A multi-trait multi-locus stepwise approach for conducting GWAS on correlated traits.The plant genome · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to accurately quantify the simultaneous effect of multiple genomic loci on multiple traits is now possible due to current and emerging high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies. To date, most efforts to quantify these genotype-to-phenotype relationships have focused on either multi-trait models that test a single marker at a time or multi-locus models that quantify associations with a single trait. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the performance of a multi-trait, multi-locus stepwise (MSTEP) model selection procedure we developed to (a) a commonly used multi-trait single-locus model and (b) a univariate multi-locus model. We used real marker data in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) to simulate multiple traits controlled by various combinations of pleiotropic and nonpleiotropic quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs). In general, we found that both multi-trait models outperformed the univariate multi-locus model, especially when analyzing a trait of low heritability. For traits controlled by either a combination of pleiotropic and nonpleiotropic QTNs or a large number of QTNs (i.e., 50), our MSTEP model often outperformed at least one of the two alternative models. When applied to the analysis of two tocochromanol-related traits in maize grain, MSTEP identified the same peak-associated marker that has been reported in a previous study. We therefore conclude that MSTEP is a useful addition to the suite of statistical models that are commonly used to gain insight into the genetic architecture of agronomically important traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.