Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35307866›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2022

Registered nurses' approach to pressure injury prevention: A descriptive qualitative study.

Zhaoyu Li, Andrea P Marshall, Frances Lin, Yanming Ding, Wendy Chaboyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhaoyu LiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Griffith, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-6209
Andrea P MarshallSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Griffith, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-403X
Frances LinSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Griffith, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-5469
Yanming DingNursing Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wendy ChaboyerNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Griffith, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814
Griffith University · AUPeking University · CN

Funding

Griffith University Griffith University Postgraduate Research Scholars
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore Registered Nurses' approaches to pressure injury prevention, including how they perceive their roles, how they prioritize pressure injury prevention and factors influencing prevention in the Chinese context.

designA qualitative descriptive study.

methodsAudio-recorded, face-to-face, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with Registered Nurses in a large tertiary hospital in China from August to December 2020. Using the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety Model, the interview guide was developed to describe the work system, processes and outcomes (three domains) associated with nurses' pressure injury prevention practices. Deductive and inductive content analyses were used.

findingsTwenty-seven nurses participated in the interviews. Four themes related to two domains of the model emerged: Work system: (i) Nurses lead and coordinate pressure injury prevention; Work processes: (ii) Individualized pressure injury prevention is founded on comprehensive patient assessment; (iii) Collaborating ensures patients receive appropriate pressure injury prevention; and (iv) Competing factors influence the delivery of appropriate pressure injury prevention. One category emerged about work outcome: Nurses strive to do their best in pressure injury prevention but hold major concerns when pressure injuries occur.

conclusionsNurses play a leading role in pressure injury prevention delivery but require appropriate resources and assistance and support from other healthcare personnel, patients and carers. Understaffing, lack of resources, complex reporting and poor patient compliance challenge nurses in their delivery of pressure injury prevention. IMPACT: Pressure injury prevention is primarily a nursing responsibility therefore nurses' approaches to prevention were explored. Nurses rely on collaboration with others and access to various resources to provide pressure injury prevention. They recognize the patients' and carers' roles and acknowledge the importance of accessing guidance and support from nursing leaders and wound experts. Acknowledging nurses leading role in prevention and ensuring they have adequate resources are important for quality care.

Indexed as

NursesPressure UlcerQuality of Health CareChinaHumansPatient SafetyQualitative Researchinterviewnursespressure injury preventionpressure ulcer/injuryqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35307866
PMCPMC9545357
OpenAlexW4220894001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.