Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35307815›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

A national quality improvement study identifying and addressing cancer screening deficits due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Rachel H Joung, Heidi Nelson, Timothy W Mullett, Scott H Kurtzman, Sarah Shafir, James B Harris, Katharine A Yao, Brian C Brajcich, Karl Y Bilimoria, William G Cance

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cancer Screening in the United States During the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel H JoungDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-4120-1058
Heidi NelsonCancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
Timothy W MullettCancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
Scott H KurtzmanNational Accreditation Program for Breast Centers, Chicago, Illinois.
Sarah ShafirAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
James B HarrisCancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
Katharine A YaoNational Accreditation Program for Breast Centers, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-8642-4087
Brian C BrajcichDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Karl Y BilimoriaDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
William G CanceAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Northwestern University · USAmerican Cancer Society · USAmerican College of Surgeons · USFertility Centers of Illinois · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

COllaborative Northwestern Surgical Oncology Research Training (CONSORT)T32CA247801 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ACKERMANN, RONALD T., KHAN, SEEMA AHSAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA247801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer-related deaths over the next decade are expected to increase due to cancer screening deficits associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Although national deficits have been quantified, a structured response to identifying and addressing local deficits has not been widely available. The objectives of this report are to share preliminary data on monthly screening deficits in breast, colorectal, lung, and cervical cancers across diverse settings and to provide online materials from a national quality improvement (QI) study to help other institutions to address local screening deficits.

methodsThis prospective, national QI study on Return-to-Screening enrolled 748 accredited cancer programs in the United States from April through June 2021. Local prepandemic and pandemic monthly screening test volumes (MTVs) were used to calculate the relative percent change in MTV to describe the monthly screening gap.

resultsThe majority of facilities reported monthly screening deficits (colorectal cancer, 80.6% [n = 104/129]; cervical cancer, 69.0% [n = 20/29]; breast cancer, 55.3% [n = 241/436]; lung cancer, 44.6% [n = 98/220]). Overall, the median relative percent change in MTV ranged from -17.7% for colorectal cancer (interquartile range [IQR], -33.6% to -2.8%), -6.8% for cervical cancer (IQR, -29.4% to 1.7%), -1.6% for breast cancer (IQR, -9.6% to 7.0%), and 1.2% for lung cancer (IQR, -16.9% to 19.0%). Geographic differences were not observed. There were statistically significant differences in the percent change in MTV between institution types for colorectal cancer screening (P = .02).

conclusionCancer screening is still in need of urgent attention, and the screening resources made available online may help facilities to close critical gaps and address screenings missed in 2020. LAY SUMMARY: Question: How can the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on cancer screening be mitigated?

findingsWhen national resources were provided, including methods to calculate local screening deficits, 748 cancer programs promptly enrolled in a national Return-to-Screening study, and the majority identified local screening deficits, most notably in colorectal cancer. Using these results, 814 quality improvement projects were initiated with the potential to add 70,000 screening tests in 2021. Meaning: Cancer screening is still in need of urgent attention, and the online resources that we provide may help to close critical screening deficits.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsCOVID-19Lung NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementUnited Statesbreast cancer screeningcancer screening and preventioncervical cancer screeningcolorectal cancer screeningcoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemiclung cancer screeningquality improvementscreening deficitsscreening disparities

Identifiers

PMID35307815
PMCPMC9086125
OpenAlexW4221042537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.