Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35307370›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

Factors that differentiate COVID-19 vaccine intentions among Indiana parents: Implications for targeted vaccine promotion.

Katharine J Head, Gregory D Zimet, Constantin T Yiannoutsos, Ross D Silverman, Lindsey Sanner, Nir Menachemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unvaccinated Adolescents' COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions: Implications for Public Health Messaging.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katharine J HeadDepartment of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, United States of America. Electronic address: headkj@iupui.edu.
Gregory D ZimetDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States of America. Electronic address: gzimet@iu.edu.
Constantin T YiannoutsosDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, United States of America. Electronic address: cyiannou@iu.edu.
Ross D SilvermanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, United States of America.
Lindsey SannerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, United States of America. Electronic address: lmsanner@iu.edu.
Nir MenachemiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, United States of America. Electronic address: nirmena@iu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given low rates of uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine for children 12-17 and 5-11 years old, research is needed to understand parental behaviors and behavioral intentions related to COVID-19 vaccination for their children. In the state of Indiana, we conducted a non-random, online survey of parents or caregivers (N = 10,266) about their COVID-19 vaccine intentions or behaviors, demographic characteristics, and potential motivating reasons for getting the vaccine. In terms of behaviors/intentions, 44.8% of participants indicated they were vaccine acceptors (i.e., had already had their children vaccinated or would as soon as it was possible), 13.0% indicated they were vaccine hesitators (i.e., wanted to wait and see), and 42.2% indicated they were vaccine rejecters (i.e., would not vaccinate or only would if mandated). Compared to vaccine rejecters, vaccine hesitators were more likely to be motivated by perceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy, normative influences such as close friends/family who had been vaccinated and a recommendation from a provider, as well as if they were vaccinated themselves. These findings have implications for the development of targeted vaccine promotion strategies, such as social norms messaging and a focus on vaccine safety, in order to increase COVID-19 vaccination for eligible children.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesChildCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansIndianaIntentionParentsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesAdolescentsChildrenCOVID-19 vaccinationHealth promotionParentVaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID35307370
PMCPMC8928699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.