Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35307324›Full record

ReviewSurvey of ophthalmology

Current management of infantile cataracts.

Phoebe D Lenhart, Scott R Lambert

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Survey of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Content Analysis of a Congenital Cataract Social Media Support Group.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phoebe D LenhartDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: phoebe.lenhart@emory.edu.
Scott R LambertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Emory University · USStanford University · US

Funding

P30-Core Grant for Vision Research Core CP30EY006360 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NICKERSON, JOHN M · 1986 to 2025
$15.3M
Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY006360NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infantile cataracts remain one of the most treatable causes of lifelong visual impairment. While the chance of improving vision for children with infantile cataracts has never been better, significant global and socioeconomic disparities still exist in their early management. Recent epidemiological studies reveal a stable prevalence of infantile cataracts in high-income countries and highlight challenges in determining the prevalence of infantile cataracts in low-income countries. Detailed descriptions of cataract morphology may inform us as to etiology, provide guidance with regards to surgical approach, and have prognostic value. Molecular genetics is providing new insights into the hereditary bases and potential systemic associations of infantile cataracts. For visually significant infantile cataracts requiring surgery to clear the visual axis, surgical techniques continue to evolve based on the experiences and research efforts of skilled teams worldwide. The most common complications of cataract surgery performed in infancy are visual axis opacification and, in about a third of patients, the long-term development of glaucoma. Children with unilateral cataracts generally see well given the presence of a healthy fellow eye. Better visual outcomes in operated eyes, however, are achieved in the setting of early presentation, bilateral infantile cataracts, absence of nystagmus or strabismus, and consistent amblyopia therapy. While intraocular lenses for infants less than 6 months can result in good visual outcomes, contact lenses may be preferred in situations in which they are available and practical. Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of early surgery for infantile cataract. We must strive for the continued evolution of technologies and strategies that have the potential to further improve these outcomes.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionLens, CrystallineLenses, IntraocularChildFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantLens Implantation, IntraocularRetrospective Studiescongenital cataractInfantile cataract

Identifiers

PMID35307324
PMCPMC10199332
OpenAlexW4221098686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.