ReviewSeminars in nuclear medicine2022
Advances in Preclinical PET.
Review in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential and challenges of Positron Emission Tomography beyond conventional preclinical and clinical imaging.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Design and first experimental results of an edgeless PET prototype for breast imaging: DeepBreast.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- (Hybrid) SPECT and PET Technologies.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Performance evaluation of the nanoScanEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Therapeutic evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- A pre-clinical PET scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator (AnnPET): construction and NU4-2008 performance testing.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Specific reaction conditions for efficient automatedFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The effects of music and darkness on radionuclide distribution during mice FDG-PET scan.Iranian journal of veterinary research · 2025Article
- Preclinical magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the fields of radiological technology, medical physics, and radiology.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Review
- A look at radiation detectors and their applications in medical imaging.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The classical intent of PET imaging is to obtain the most accurate estimate of the amount of positron-emitting radiotracer in the smallest possible volume element located anywhere in the imaging subject at any time using the least amount of radioactivity. Reaching this goal, however, is confounded by an enormous array of interlinked technical issues that limit imaging system performance. As a result, advances in PET, human or animal, are the result of cumulative innovations across each of the component elements of PET, from data acquisition to image analysis. In the report that follows, we trace several of these advances across the imaging process with a focus on small animal PET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.