Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35307114›Full record

ReviewSeminars in radiation oncology2022

Exclusion of Older Adults from Cancer Clinical Trials: Review of the Literature and Future Recommendations.

Isabela M Bumanlag, Joseph Abi Jaoude, Michael K Rooney, Cullen M Taniguchi, Ethan B Ludmir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabela M BumanlagThe University of Texas, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.; The University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
Joseph Abi JaoudeThe University of Texas, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Michael K RooneyThe University of Texas, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Cullen M TaniguchiThe University of Texas, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ethan B LudmirThe University of Texas, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.. Electronic address: ebludmir@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
CANCER PREVENTION EDUCAT--STUDENT RESEARCH EXPERIENCESR25CA056452 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Shine Chang · 1992 to 2026
$6.9M
Translating Intestinal Radioprotection by EGLN Inhibition to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Unresectable Pancreatic CancerR01CA227517 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KOONG, ALBERT · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227517NCI NIH HHS R25 CA056452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we present the context of older adult (OA) cancer patients within the broader cancer population, including cancer burdens and trial representation. We first describe the proportion of older adults in clinical trials, with studies showing strong evidence that the proportion of OA in cancer trials is much less than the proportion of OA in the overall cancer population. We highlight the lack of generalizability that can lead to challenges in treatment decisions for OA as well as concerns regarding health inequity. We then discuss barriers to OA enrollment related to trial structure and design, physician perspective, and patient and/or caregiver perspective. We expand on this further by outlining these barriers throughout the process of trial design, patient enrollment/trial implementation, and data analysis in post-market settings. We summarize guidelines from national societies, regulatory agencies, and other institutional bodies, then present a compilation of on-the-ground actionable recommendations to address the challenges of clinical trial design, focusing on geriatric assessments and OA-specific trials. We conclude by providing an outline for future directions, noting specifically the potential impact that radiotherapy and radiation oncology may have on clinical trials related to OA patients.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPhysiciansAgedClinical Trials as TopicHumansPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID35307114
PMCPMC8944215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.