Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35307030›Full record

Observational studyRespiratory research2022

Sphingosine-1-phosphate and CRP as potential combination biomarkers in discrimination of COPD with community-acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbation of COPD.

Chin-Wang Hsu, Chi-Won Suk, Yuan-Pin Hsu, Jer-Hwa Chang, Chung-Te Liu, Shau-Ku Huang, Shih-Chang Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chin-Wang HsuEmergency Department, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Won SukDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yuan-Pin HsuEmergency Department, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jer-Hwa ChangDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung-Te LiuGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shau-Ku HuangNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Shih-Chang HsuEmergency Department, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. bradhsu1980@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-1182
Wan Fang Hospital · TWJohns Hopkins University · USTaipei Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

National Health Research Institutes EM110-PP-10Taipei Medical University 107-wf-swf-06Taipei Medical University 109-wf-swf-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant public health concern. The patients with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) and pneumonia have similar clinical presentations. The use of conventional diagnostic markers, such as complete blood count with differential and C-reactive protein (CRP), is the current mainstream method for differentiating clinically relevant pneumonia from other mimics. However, those conventional methods have suboptimal sensitivity and specificity for patients with a clinical suspicion of infection. The limitations often cause the ambiguity of the initiation of antibiotic treatment. Recently, our pilot study suggested that the patients with pneumonia have significantly higher plasma Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) levels than controls. The initial findings suggest that plasma S1P is a potential biomarker for predicting prognosis in pneumonia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of S1P and CRP for discriminating COPD with pneumonia and AECOPD in an Emergency Department (ED) setting.

methodsPatients diagnosed with AECOPD or COPD with pneumonia were recruited from the Emergency Department of Wan Fang Hospital. The clinical data, demographics, and blood samples were collected upon ED admission. The concentration of plasma S1P was measured by ELISA.

resultsThirty-nine patients with AECOPD and 78 with COPD plus pneumonia were enrolled in this observational study. The levels of blood S1P and CRP were significantly higher in patients with COPD plus CAP compared to those in AE COPD patients. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for the S1P and CRP for distinguishing between patients with COPD plus CAP and AECOPD is 0.939 (95% CI: 0.894-0.984) and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.826-0.945), whereas the combination of S1P and CRP yielded a value of 0.994 (95% CI: 0.897-1.000). By comparing with CRP or S1P, combining CRP and S1P had significantly higher AUC value for differentiating between the COPD with pneumonia group and the AECOPD group.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that S1P is a potential diagnostic biomarker in distinguishing COPD with CAP from AECOPD. Additionally, the diagnostic ability of S1P can be improved when used in combination with CRP.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCommunity-Acquired InfectionsC-Reactive ProteinDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLysophospholipidsMalePneumoniaProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSphingosineBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinLysophospholipidsSphingosinesphingosine 1-phosphateChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseC-reactive proteinPneumoniaSphingosine-1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID35307030
PMCPMC8935698
OpenAlexW4220816842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.