Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35307013›Full record

ArticleAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2022

Official position of the Brazilian Association of Bone Assessment and Metabolism (ABRASSO) on the evaluation of body composition by densitometry: part I (technical aspects)-general concepts, indications, acquisition, and analysis.

Sergio Setsuo Maeda, Barbara Santarosa Emo Peters, Lígia Araújo Martini, Hannah Karen Moreira Antunes, Maria Cristina Gonzalez, Henrique Pierotti Arantes, Carla M Prado, Camila Lemos Pinto, Iana Mizumukai de Araújo, Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sergio Setsuo MaedaDiscipline of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Estado de Israel, 639, São Paulo, SP, 04022-001, Brazil. ssetsuo@terra.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-2669-4245
Barbara Santarosa Emo PetersDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lígia Araújo MartiniDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hannah Karen Moreira AntunesDepartment of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Cristina GonzalezPostgraduate Program in Health and Behavior, Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Henrique Pierotti ArantesSchool of Medicine, Instituto Master de Ensino Presidente Antônio Carlos (IMEPAC), Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Carla M PradoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Division of Human Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Camila Lemos PintoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Division of Human Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Iana Mizumukai de AraújoDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Francisco José Albuquerque de PaulaDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Joao Lindolfo Cunha BorgesClinical Research Center of Brazil, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Ben-Hur AlbergariaDepartment of Epidemiology, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Marcela UshidaDiscipline of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme Cardenaz de SouzaBone d Consultoria e Treinamento, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Laura Maria Carvalho de MendonçaDiscipline of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Mirley do PradoClínica Janice Lamas Radiologia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Marcelo de Medeiros PinheiroDiscipline of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the technical aspects of body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and other methods based on the most recent scientific evidence. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis Official Position is a result of efforts by the Scientific Committee of the Brazilian Association of Bone Assessment and Metabolism (Associação Brasileira de Avaliação Óssea e Osteometabolismo, ABRASSO) and health care professionals with expertise in body composition assessment who were invited to contribute to the preparation of this document. The authors searched current databases for relevant publications. In this first part of the Official Position, the authors discuss the different methods and parameters used for body composition assessment, general principles of DXA, and aspects of the acquisition and analysis of DXA scans.

conclusionConsidering aspects of accuracy, precision, cost, duration, and ability to evaluate all three compartments, DXA is considered the gold-standard method for body composition assessment, particularly for the evaluation of fat mass. In order to ensure reliable, adequate, and reproducible DXA reports, great attention is required regarding quality control procedures, preparation, removal of external artifacts, imaging acquisition, and data analysis and interpretation.

Indexed as

Body CompositionAbsorptiometry, PhotonBrazilElectric ImpedanceHumansReproducibility of ResultsAbsorptiometryBioelectrical impedance analysisBody compositionComputed tomographyDXAMagnetic resonance imagingPlethysmographySkinfoldUltrasoundX-ray

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.