Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306903›Full record

ArticlePolicy, politics & nursing practice2022

The European Standard EN 17398:2020 on Patient Involvement in Health Care - a Fairclough-Inspired Critical Discourse Analysis.

Sigrid Stjernswärd, Stinne Glasdam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Policy, politics & nursing practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sigrid StjernswärdDepartment of Health Sciences, 59568Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-9206
Stinne GlasdamDepartment of Health Sciences, 59568Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0893-3054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of 'patient involvement' is highlighted in healthcare. However, hindrances can prevent its implementation. This article explored how 'patient involvement' is understood and on what ideas this understanding is based through a critical textual analysis of the European document on patient involvement in health systems using a Fairclough-inspired critical discourse analysis. The findings showed that the document arose from a social discourse based on a mix of a neoliberal ideology, with a marketisation of care focusing on a cost-effective and evidence-based logic of care,

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationHumanshealth systemspatient involvementstandard

Identifiers

PMID35306903
PMCPMC9014666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.