Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306896›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Dosage compensation evolution in plants: theories, controversies and mechanisms.

Aline Muyle, Gabriel A B Marais, Václav Bačovský, Roman Hobza, Thomas Lenormand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The genomic and epigenomic landscapes of hemizygous genes across crops with contrasting reproductive systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  8. Sexy ways: approaches to studying plant sex chromosomes.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Compensation of gene dosage on the mammalian X.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evolution of sex-determination in dioecious plants: From active Y to X/A balance?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Sex determination and sex chromosome evolution in land plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aline MuyleLaboratoire 'Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive', CNRS/Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2200-2336
Gabriel A B MaraisLaboratoire 'Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive', CNRS/Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2134-5967
Václav BačovskýDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 135, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7621-8936
Roman HobzaDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 135, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3062-2962
Thomas LenormandCEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8930-5393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a minority of flowering plants, separate sexes are genetically determined by sex chromosomes. The Y chromosome has a non-recombining region that degenerates, causing a reduced expression of Y genes. In some species, the lower Y expression is accompanied by dosage compensation (DC), a mechanism that re-equalizes male and female expression and/or brings XY male expression back to its ancestral level. Here, we review work on DC in plants, which started as early as the late 1960s with cytological approaches. The use of transcriptomics fired a controversy as to whether DC existed in plants. Further work revealed that various plants exhibit partial DC, including a few species with young and homomorphic sex chromosomes. We are starting to understand the mechanisms responsible for DC in some plants, but in most species, we lack the data to differentiate between global and gene-by-gene DC. Also, it is unknown why some species evolve many dosage compensated genes while others do not. Finally, the forces that drive DC evolution remain mysterious, both in plants and animals. We review the multiple evolutionary theories that have been proposed to explain DC patterns in eukaryotes with XY or ZW sex chromosomes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Sex determination and sex chromosome evolution in land plants'.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticSex ChromosomesAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemaleMalePlantscis-regulatory sequence divergencedosage balancedosage-sensitive genesimprintingsex chromosomesY degeneration

Identifiers

PMID35306896
PMCPMC8935305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.