Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306887›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

ARR17 controls dioecy in

Ana P Leite Montalvão, Birgit Kersten, Gihwan Kim, Matthias Fladung, Niels A Müller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cloning and Functional Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sex determination and sex chromosome evolution in land plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana P Leite MontalvãoThünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landstrasse 2, 22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Birgit KerstenThünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landstrasse 2, 22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Gihwan KimThünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landstrasse 2, 22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Matthias FladungThünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landstrasse 2, 22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Niels A MüllerThünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landstrasse 2, 22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5213-042X
Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of dioecious species for which the genetic basis of sex determination has been resolved is rapidly increasing. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms downstream of the sex determinants remain largely elusive. Here, by RNA-sequencing early-flowering isogenic aspen (

Indexed as

PopulusFlowersGene ExpressionGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, PlantHormonesPlant ProteinsHormonesPlant Proteinscytokinindioecyflower developmentpoplarsingle gene sex determination

Identifiers

PMID35306887
PMCPMC8935312
OpenAlexW4220929936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.