ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2022
Pedobarographic Measurements of Rheumatoid Feet Compared with Clinical Parameters.
Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between plantar pressure pedobarographic measurements and disease activity, radiological abnormalities, and foot indexes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Sociodemographics, foot symptoms, anatomical distribution, pain intensity and duration, and podiatry services access data were collected. Disease activity scale of 28 joints (DAS28) was used for the disease activity, and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) was used for the functional status. Foot function index (FFI) was used to measure the impact of foot pathology on its function. The Modified Larsen scoring was used to assess radiological abnormalities. Pedobarographic measurements were used to analyze foot loading characteristics. Results: A total of 104 feet of 52 patients with RA was evaluated. DAS28 scores did not correlate with the plantar pressure values (p>0.05). A significant correlation was found between HAQ scores and right medial midfoot loading pressure (r=0.355; p<0.01). FFI scores were positively correlated with right lateral midfoot loading pressure (r=0.302; p<0.05). No relationship was found between Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index and plantar loading characteristics. The radiological scores were correlated with left lateral hindfoot plantar pressure (r=0.286; p<0.05). Conclusions: Pedobarographic measurements can be considered as a follow-up evaluation tool for the evaluation of all foot parts (forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot). Rheumatoid feet investigation showed that foot involvement is independent of the disease duration, whereas midfoot plantar pressures are associated with the body mass index. Additionally, DAS28 may fall short as a marker of disease activity because it neglects foot problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.