ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2022
Comparison of Maternal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Outcomes of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Pregnant Women with Coronavirus Disease-2019.
Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic scoping review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the postpartum outcomes of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women with COVID-19. Pregnant women were categorized into two sets as asymptomatic and symptomatic according to their clinics at the time of application. COVID-19 was diagnosed using the real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction on the oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs. Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were compared in terms of maternal and perinatal outcomes. Results: Our study population consisted of 20 asymptomatic and 41 symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. The rate of primary cesarean section was more than twice in the symptomatic group (51.2%) than that of the asymptomatic group (20%) (p=0.019). Both groups are quite similar in terms of maternal [respiratory support, COVID-19- related treatment, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission], perinatal (preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membrane, preeclampsia, and mode of delivery), and neonatal outcomes [birth weight, Apgar scores, neonatal ICU (NICU) admission]. The rate of total cesarean section in the asymptomatic group (75%) was statistically similar to the symptomatic group (83%) (p=0.464). The NICU admission rate was found to be similar in the asymptomatic (54.2%) and symptomatic groups (50%) (p=0.858). However, NICU admissions were more frequent in the symptomatic group due to respiratory distress (p=0.032). The breastfeeding rate is higher in the asymptomatic pregnant group as expected (p=0.015). Additionally, the ferritin level was significantly lower in the asymptomatic group (p=0.006). Conclusions: The rate of primary cesarean section is quite high in symptomatic patients with COVID-19. Additionally, the total cesarean section rate was extremely high in both groups. We expected more adverse outcomes in symptomatic patients; however, we found similar maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes between both groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.