Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306721›Full record

ArticleDermatologic therapy2022

Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic in Italian health care workers.

Ilaria Proietti, Ivan Borrelli, Nevena Skroza, Paolo Emilio Santoro, Maria Rosaria Gualano, Nicoletta Bernardini, Alessandra Mambrin, Ersilia Tolino, Anna Marchesiello, Federica Marraffa and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatologic therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilaria ProiettiDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3795-3190
Ivan BorrelliDepartment of Health Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Nevena SkrozaDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.
Paolo Emilio SantoroDepartment of Health Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Maria Rosaria GualanoDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Nicoletta BernardiniDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6295-3574
Alessandra MambrinDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.
Ersilia TolinoDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7861-9338
Anna MarchesielloDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.
Federica MarraffaDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.
Simone MicheliniDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-7384
Giovanni RossiDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.
Salvatore VolpeDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6367-2344
Walter RicciardiDepartment of Health Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Umberto MoscatoDepartment of Health Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Concetta PotenzaDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To avoid exposure to SARS-COV-2, healthcare professionals must use personal protective equipment (PPE). Their use has been related to a series of adverse effects; the most frequent adverse events were headache, dyspnoea, and pressure injuries. Skin adverse effects are very common, including contact dermatitis, itching, erythema, and acneiform eruptions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the skin problems caused by personal protection equipment (PPE) in health care workers (HCWs) and to individuate eventual risk factors. From May to June 2020 a retrospective observational multi-centric study conducted by an online survey sent by email, involving 10 hospital centers, was performed. We considered as independent variables gender and age, occupational group and sector, time of utilization, type and material of PPE. We tested 3 types of PPE: gloves, bonnet, and mask for different time of utilization (<1, 1-3, 3-6, >6 h). We performed a multiple logistic regression model to correlate them with skin adverse events occurrence. Among all the 1184 participants, 292 workers reported a dermatological pathology: 45 (15.41%) had psoriasis, 54 (18.49%) eczema, 38 (13.01%) acne, 48 (16.44%) seborrheic dermatitis, and 107 (36.64%) other. In our sample previous inflammatory dermatological conditions, female sex, prolonged use of PPE were significant risk factors for developing skin related adverse events considering all the PPE considered. The use of PPE is still mandatory in the hospital setting and skin adverse reactions still represent a global problem. Although data from Europe are limited, our study highlighted the importance of the problem of PPE skin reactions in a large sample of Italian healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

COVID-19Personal Protective EquipmentFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19dermatologypersonal protective equipment

Identifiers

PMID35306721
PMCPMC9111857
OpenAlexW4221033487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.