Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306619›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2022

Navigation strategies in patients with vestibular loss tested in a virtual reality T-maze.

Roberto Gammeri, Jacques Léonard, Michel Toupet, Charlotte Hautefort, Christian van Nechel, Stéphane Besnard, Marie-Laure Machado, Estelle Nakul, Marion Montava, Jean-Pierre Lavieille and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roberto GammeriAix Marseille University, CNRS, LNC, FR3C, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7858-0653
Jacques LéonardAix Marseille University, CNRS, LNC, FR3C, Marseille, France.
Michel ToupetIRON, Institut de Recherche en Oto-Neurologie, Paris, France.
Charlotte HautefortIRON, Institut de Recherche en Oto-Neurologie, Paris, France.
Christian van NechelIRON, Institut de Recherche en Oto-Neurologie, Paris, France.
Stéphane BesnardUniversité de Normandie, INSERM U1075 COMETE, Caen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9659-8005
Marie-Laure MachadoUniversité de Normandie, INSERM U1075 COMETE, Caen, France.
Estelle NakulAix Marseille University, CNRS, LNC, FR3C, Marseille, France.
Marion MontavaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hôpital La Conception, APHM, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1347-9412
Jean-Pierre LavieilleDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hôpital La Conception, APHM, Marseille, France.
Christophe LopezAix Marseille University, CNRS, LNC, FR3C, Marseille, France. christophe.lopez@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-2969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During navigation, humans mainly rely on egocentric and allocentric spatial strategies, two different frames of reference working together to build a coherent representation of the environment. Spatial memory deficits during navigation have been repeatedly reported in patients with vestibular disorders. However, little is known about how vestibular disorders can change the use of spatial navigation strategies. Here, we used a new reverse T-maze paradigm in virtual reality to explore whether vestibular loss specifically modifies the use of egocentric or allocentric spatial strategies in patients with unilateral (n = 23) and bilateral (n = 23) vestibular loss compared to healthy volunteers (n = 23) matched for age, sex and education level. Results showed that the odds of selecting and using a specific strategy in the T-maze were significantly reduced in both unilateral and bilateral vestibular loss. An exploratory analysis suggests that only right vestibular loss decreased the odds of adopting a spatial strategy, indicating an asymmetry of vestibular functions. When considering patients who used strategies to navigate, we observed that a bilateral vestibular loss reduced the odds to use an allocentric strategy, whereas a unilateral vestibular loss decreased the odds to use an egocentric strategy. Age was significantly associated with an overall lower chance to adopt a navigation strategy and, more specifically, with a decrease in the odds of using an allocentric strategy. We did not observe any sex difference in the ability to select and use a specific navigation strategy. Findings are discussed in light of previous studies on visuo-spatial abilities and studies of vestibulo-hippocampal interactions in peripheral vestibular disorders. We discuss the potential impact of the history of the disease (chronic stage in patients with a bilateral vestibulopathy vs. subacute stage in patients with a unilateral vestibular loss), of hearing impairment and non-specific attentional deficits in patients with vestibular disorders.

Indexed as

Bilateral VestibulopathySpatial NavigationVestibular DiseasesVirtual RealityFemaleHumansMaleMaze LearningMemory DisordersSpace PerceptionAllocentricEgocentricLabyrinthReference frameSpatial navigationSpatial strategiesVestibular system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.